But these two stories that I read today were not great. I
would categorize them as women complaining and less as humorous anecdotes about
their life. While the first story did have a few laughs, the second was just
plain awkward. Dorothy Parker’s short story ‘The Waltz’ begins in a light mood
that had potential. I could hear this woman racing through dozens of thoughts,
jumping around to different places. It appeared to me as the type of thing a
woman does when she is nervous or feels uncomfortable. Most people would feel
those emotions in her given situation-dancing with a stranger.
The first hint of humor I found in this story was through
her sarcasm. I am a fairly sarcastic person and surround myself with people who
find sarcasm as a form of humor and who do not take it in a nasty manner. But
there are some people who do not find it funny, and instead find it mean. While
reading the first few pages of this story I was inclined to think of her
sarcasm as the former. For instance, when she is commenting on what else she
was supposed to do when someone asks her to dance I found that true and funny.
She says, or more correctly she thinks, “What can you say, when a man ask you
to dance with him? I most certainly will not dance, with you, I’ll see you in
hell first.” (p. 72). This is the kind of response a person would say to a
friend when they are justifying an action that they did not want to do. There
was no polite way to get out of that situation so she had to be polite by
saying yes. I found her response sarcastic, which is where the humor is brought
in. Someone who has never been exposed to sarcasm as a form of humor may find
her remarks solely harsh. Those cultures in different parts of the world, other
than here in the US, may not understand sarcasm and thus would find this story
mean.
Another element of humor in this book was the juxtaposition.
While she thinks to herself that him stepping on her hurts a great deal, she
tells him it did not hurt and that is was her fault. The nicety she attempts to
put of brings a few moments of laughter to this story. Exaggeration is another
area that is explored to create humor. When the song keeps going, she begins to
feel irritated about the length of the song. At one point she comments about
“the thirty-five years this Waltz has lasted” (p. 75). The song has obviously
not lasted that long, but her desire for the song to end makes every second
seem like years. I think I found this part funny, because it could easily
happen to me, or to anyone really. We have all attended meetings or waited for
someone and felt that time was not moving at all. That feeling of the event
never ending makes us exaggerate. That is what this author is feeling during
this dance.
Up to this point in the story, the woman appears irritated
and thus comes across as funny. But she soon turns in to a jerk who is just
plain mean. When she begins to think about going back to the table and no long
dancing she says “ I’d probably have to talk to him” (p. 76). Now that is just
mean. At this point she is just complaining about anything she can. She needs
to stop because she puts herself in a negative light. What has this guy ever
done to her? Nothing, except be courteous. From there, it just gets worse. She complains the rest of
the pages and is a liar when she ends by saying she is sad that the band is
stopping. I do not like complainers.
The second story is not much better. Nora Ephron rambles on
for twelve pages about how she has small breasts. She does not say anything
funny and is just awkward. She reveals personal information about faking cramps
and about the first guy who touched her. Honestly, I did not like this story
either. I think she should have written this in her diary and not published it.
I am unclear as to why anyone would classify this as a funny story. It is just
one woman complaining. The only slightly humorous part is when she tells of her
friend who thought that breast grow when husbands rub and kiss them. The pure
dumbness and random illogical thinking that went in to someone think that was
true made me laugh. Other than that, there was nothing redeeming about it.
Hi Jennifer, thanks for posting on the Parker and Ephron texts. I can understand your responses. Some people find these texts highly humorous, and others not so humorous at all. But this does show that humor is conditional and personal. But I think regardless of the laughter element you touched on many of the techniques both authors used to develop their humor, especially juxtaposition. dw
ReplyDeleteHi Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteI found these two readings quite peculiar myself. After reading them the first time through, I had the same reaction; they are just stories about women complaining and that doesn't strike me as humorous. However, after our brief discussion in class today, I see how some people could appreciate the humor presented in these texts.